___________________
PROCEEDINGS
from the
Sixteenth Annual Conference

The Art of Teaching

Creating a Learning Environment

January 12 & 13, 2006
Howard Community College

Facts About AFFACT | List of Representatives | Table of Contents

Conference Coordinator, Chair
Cathy Sewell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Chesapeake College

Site Coordinator
Russ Baker. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howard Community College

Proceedings Editor
Marilyn Pugh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Prince George's Community College

AFACCT Facts

AFACCT is an association of and for Maryland Community College faculty.  It was established in 1984 with the following goals:

AFACCT's decisions are made by a Board of Representatives which consists of one member from each of the Maryland Community Colleges who serves as a liaison.  In addition, a Coordinator and an Assistant Coordinator, elected by the Board, serve with direction from the instructional vice-presidents or deans.

The AFACCT Board of Representatives
Allegany CC Debbie Frank, Hospitality Management
Anne Arundel CC Suzanne Spoor, English and Women's Studies (Secretary)
Baltimore City CC Grace E. McNeal, Nursing
Carroll CC Alan Bogage, Library Director, English Adjunct
Cecil CC Nancy Cannon, Reading
Chesapeake College Cathy Sewell, Academic Support Center Coordinator (AFACCT Coordinator)
Stan Kajs, Humanities
College of Southern Maryland Richard J. Siciliano, Languages and Literature (AFACCT Web Master)
CCBC - Catonsville Nelda Nix-McCray, Sociology
CCBC - Dundalk Bernadette Low, English
CCBC - Essex David Thorndill, Biology
Frederick CC Craig Weincek, English & Communications
Garrett CC Lonnie Brewster, English
Hagerstown CC Paul Jozik, Physics (Treasurer)
Harford CC Avery Ward,  Political Science
Howard CC Russ Baker, Mathematics
Montgomery College - Germantown Jon Frederick Kreissig, Health/Physical Education
Montgomery College - Rockville Shah Mehrabi, Economics
Prince George's CC Marilyn Pugh, Economics, Director of the Center for Academic Resource Development (Assistant Coordinator)
Wor-Wic CC Susan Twigg, Mathematics
Colleen Weil, Nursing
Maryland Community Colleges Chief Academic Officers Andrea L. Smith, Chief Academic Officer, College of Southern Maryland

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Supporting Transitional Math Students Through Math Labs
        Nanci Barker

The Science of Learning: Some Guidelines that Educational and Psychological Research have Found that can Help Us Increase Student Learning
        James Bell

Playing I.T. Safe: An RD103/CA106 Learning Community
        Eileen Cotter and Karen Penn de Martinez

Creating Interactive, Online Courses
        Laura Hutton

The Nursing Faculty Shortage: A Phenomenological Approach
        Cherry A. Karl

Defining the Patuxent River Watershed: An Exercise  
        Debby Luquette

Problem Based Learning: Its Use in the Nursing Skills Lab
        Kathleen M. Martin and Lisa A. Gotschall

What Works in Classes for Us
        Dr. Pete Paulson

Teaching as Art: Some Crucial Implications
         Nicholas Plants 

Barriers to Distance Education as Perceived by Computing Faculty at Two Washington, DC Area Community Colleges  
        Homer Sharafi

What is Teaching?
       
William D. Stark

 

 

Supporting Transitional Math Students
Through Math Labs

Nanci Barker
Carroll Community College

The following presentation looks at the national trends in developmental courses, the findings from CCSSE surveys, and the results from requiring a math lab component for developmental math students at Carroll Community College.

References 

CCSSE Community College Survey of Student Engagement (2005) Engaging students, challenging the odds.  Retrieved January 11,2006, from http://www.ccsse.org/publications/CCSSE_reportfinal2005.pdf

Evelyn, J. (2005) Remedial students at 2-year colleges work harder than their peers, survey finds.  The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(13), p.A38. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.

Glenn, D. (2005, July) Remedial courses help college students complete degrees, study finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(43), p. A31. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.

Hammerman, N. & Goldberg, R. (2003) Strategies for developmental math at the college level. Mathematics and Computer Education, 37(1), p.79, 17pgs. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.  

Hodges, D. Z. & Kennedy, N. H. (2004) Editor’s choice: Post-testing in developmental education: A Success Story.  Community College Review, 32(3), p.35, 9 pgs. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.

Kozeracki, C. A. (2002), ERIC review: Issues in developmental education. Community College Review, 29(4), p. 83, 18 p.  Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ERIC database.  

McCabe, R. H. (2003). Yes we can! A community college guide for developing America’s underprepared.  Phoenix, AZ: League for Innovation in Community College. 

(2004). A new algebra approach for struggling students. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), p. 40. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database. 

Vasquez, S. (2004). A report on the effectiveness of the developmental mathematics program M. Y. Math Project- Making your mathematics: knowing when and how to use it.  Mathematics and Computer Education, 38(2), p.190, 10pgs. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.  

Weinstein, G. L. (2004). Their side of the story: remedial college algebra students. Mathematics and Computer Education, 38(2), p. 230, 11 pgs. Retrieved January 07, 2006 from ProQuest Education Journals database.

Click here for PowerPoint presentation....

Return to Table of Contents

 

The Science of Learning: Some Guidelines
That Educational and Psychological Research Have Found That Can Help Us Increase Student Learning

Dr. James Bell
Professor of Psychology
jbell@howardcc.edu     410-772-4892
Howard Community College

Our Big Question: In what ways can we help students learn based on the research on how students learn for the long term (the science of learning)?

My goal: 90% of you will implement ideas to increase student learning for the long term.

When I started teaching 40 years ago, there were few resources to help teachers to think about how to teach. Now there are many resources besides the many sources on the web. Only a few, however, are based on evidence from research. Today I plan to (1) present some of the guidelines from the science of learning and (2) list some other sources from the art of teaching. Clearly an effective teacher, one who produces significant long term learning, will be using guidelines from both the science of learning and the art of teaching.

As a professor of psychology, I try to keep current in two fields of psychology which relate to student learning: the fields of learning and educational psychology. In addition, I conduct about 5 workshops yearly on active learning, critical thinking, and teaching; I work with adjunct faculty as the Coordinator of the Psychology Program at HCC, I served as the Chair of the Adjunct Faculty Committee, and I have been the researcher for the Probation Committee for over 15 years.

Bransford, Brown, and Cocking (editors) in their book How People Learn (1999) explain: "Learning is a basic, adaptive function of humans. More than any other species, people are designed to be flexible learners and active agents in acquiring knowledge and skills. Much of what people learn occurs without formal instruction, but highly systematic and organized information systems--reading, mathematics, the sciences, literature, and the history of a society--require formal training, usually in schools. Over time, science, mathematics, and history have posed new problems for learning because of their growing volume and increasing complexity. The value of the knowledge taught in school also began to be examined for its applicability to situations outside school.

Science now offers new conceptions of the learning process and the development of competent performance. Recent research provides a deep understanding of complex reasoning and performance on problem-solving tasks and how skill and understanding in key subjects are acquired." (From the executive summary) OF

The Science of Learning (My selective synthesis based on a book review of How People Learn by Bransford, Brown, and Cocking and an article by Halpern and Hakel and a quarterly journal which they edited.- sources listed later)

1. One goal should be to help students learn for the long term. (long-term retention).

How do we get long-term learning?

2. A second goal should be to help students learn to use what they have learned in different situations in the future (long-term transfer or application).

How do we get students to transfer what they learn?

3. Repetition and practice at retrieval and transfer produce long term results.

In what ways can we build in repetition and practice?

4. Unstructured experiencing can be very ineffective learning.

In what ways can we guide student learning?

What do we need to teach them to learn in our discipline?

5. It is much more important what students do in the classroom than what we do. Producing information results in more learning than presented information.

In what ways can we get students to be more active in class?

6. The way we test will greatly influence what is learned.

In what ways can we test (assess) for understanding, learning to learn, and higher order thinking skills?

7. Deep understanding is more valuable than surface learning: "less is more."

What are the most important thing to learn in a particular course?

In what ways can we teach the way of thinking of our discipline?

8. Students need to learn to use metacognitive thinking to self assess their thinking.

In what ways can we teach metacognitive thinking?

In what ways can we teach self assessment?

9. Students often have misconceptions about our discipline coming into our courses.

In what ways can we deal with student misconceptions?

10. Massed learning is less effective than spaced learning.

In what ways can we build in spaced learning?

11. New knowledge and skills get built on prior knowledge and skills.

What do student know coming into our courses?

In what ways can we best deal with differing entry levels of knowledge and skills?

Feedback Can Increase Student Learning: Some Ideas

"What is the big deal about feedback?" Well, the big deal about feedback is that it is so rare in higher education. "What do you mean ‘so rare’?" Let’s assume that your students are studying 1.5 hours for every hour in class across the 14 weeks of the semester. That would be just over 100 hours of learning for a 3 credit course. How much feedback do you think students usually get? How much feedback to they get from you? On the other hand, how much feedback do faculty get from their students?

Extensive research across 50 years has produced guidelines for increasing learning. Chickering, Gamson, and Barsi surveyed the research literature on undergraduate education and discovered 7 guidelines which they then developed into Inventories of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (1989) which is used at HCC with new full time faculty. Hatfield (1995) wrote a book entitled The Seven Principles in Action: Improving Undergraduate Education which expanded on the ideas in the inventory. Feedback to improve learning needs to be prompt, often, and specific. "The chief finding from the Harvard Assessment Seminar about the most effective courses at Harvard, as judged by students and alums, was the importance of quick and detailed feedback. Students overwhelmingly reported that the single most important ingredient for making a course effective is getting rapid response. . . their best learning takes place when they have a chance to submit an early version, get! detailed feedback and criticism, and then hand in a final revised version. (Wiggins, 1997, p. 35)

I. Ideas About Teaching and Learning

A. Central Idea: Increasing student learning can result from (1) increased feedback to students on their learning and (2) increased feedback to faculty about their teaching. "Teaching means any activity that has the conscious intention of, and potential for, facilitating learning in another." (Leamnson, 1999, Thinking about Teaching and Learning, p. 3)

B. There are 2 different problems to solve:

1. Problem: In what ways can faculty increase feedback to students?

"Unfortunately, except for grades, most college teachers do not consider feedback important and rarely provide it. Yet many different forms of feedback can contribute to learning, and generally, the more feedback, the more effective the teaching. Feedback is especially effective when used to prevent errors and to provide a student with direction and a sense of achievement." (Carlson, 1981, p. 126) "College teachers have tended not to concern themselves with teaching students how to study or to provide students with feedback on progress with the content of the course." (Carlson, 1981, p. 134)

2. Problem: In what ways can faculty get more feedback about their teaching?

"Unfortunately, teachers don’t get much feedback on their classroom behavior because their teaching is done in relative isolation. . . We may talk with other teachers about our subject, but we seldom talk about how we teach our subject. . . . For the most part, the academic world of higher education is simply not structured to give teachers regular, meaningful, sophisticated feedback about their teaching." (James Davis, 1993, Better teaching, more learning: Strategies for success in postsecondary settings. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press, pp. 9-10)

II. What is feedback?

A. Hints from a Thesaurus

clarify, define, describe, explain, inform, inspect, interpret, observe, scrutinize, study, survey; a report, an evaluation, an analysis, an assessment. If for #3 above you wrote, feedback for students and feedback for faculty as the two topics, you are correct: an example of feedback.

B. Definitions

1. Feedback is information about what I have done. If I know what I want to learn and have feedback about my progress, I can take steps to learn what I need to know to reach my goal.

a. "Feedback involves telling someone what you did and did not like or what you did or did not judge to be right in what they did --some praise and some blame." Implication - "We still think that feedback is what you get from people who do or do not like something you did. That, of course, is a mistaken view." (Grant Wiggins, 1997, Feedback: How learning occurs. In Ellen Chaffee et al.’s Assessing impact: Evidence and action. Washington, DC: AAHE. pp. 31-39. LB2331.G3.A77)

b. "Feedback describes what you did and did not do." (Wiggins, 1997, p. 34) Feedback is information about the results of a behavior.

c. Feedback can indicate whether an answer is right or wrong (also called knowledge of results). Feedback can also help students identify their own errors or mistakes (a part of self assessment).

2. "Feedback is authoritative information students receive that will reinforce or modify responses to instruction and guide them more efficiently in attaining the goals of the course." Carlson, C. (1981). In O. Milton & associates. On college teaching (pp. 125-152). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

3. "The term feedback is associated with electronics and computer science; it refers to a process whereby data are fed back to a system in order to modify conditions and maintain a predetermined equilibrium in the system. . . .Feedback is widely used today by most of us in a variety of daily situations. When we examine our bank account, paint a picture, or tutor a student, we judge the results according to an expected or desired standard. . . . Belief in our ability to alter behaviors, our desire to achieve certain goals, and awareness of the means by which we can achieve predetermined standards are powerful factors in learning and development. Indeed, many educators emphasize the essential function of feedback in the learning and instructional process." (Tamar Levin and Ruth Long, 1981, Effective instruction, Alexandria, VA: ASCD, p. 15)

4. "Feedback has been used synonymously with the term ‘knowledge of results,’ which doesn’t really convey the full meaning of feedback. . . . In his theory of school learning, Bloom (1976) refers to this essential component of learning and instruction as feedback and corrective procedures. Feedback and correction involves three related components." (Levin and Long, 1981, p. 15)

a. " . . . it includes a definition of a standard of performance. . .

b. it involves a process whereby precise, relevant, and valid evidence are gathered and reported to the students and the teacher. This provides information regarding what has been achieved and what is still needed to be learned or taught in order to reach a defined standard.

c. it includes the use of corrective procedures by which gaps in the learning, mistakes, and other misunderstandings can be relearned or corrected." Levin and Long, 1981, pp. 15-16)

5. "Effective feedback has four essential characteristics:

a. It is immediate.

b. It is specific.

c. It provides corrective information for the learner.

d. It has a positive emotional tone." (Paul Eggen and Don Kauchak, 2001, Educational psychology, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, p. 472)

6. Feedback provides information about progress to a goal or objective. Feedback helps us understand if learning occurred, whether we are on track and how much learning has occurred.

7. A major goal of a college education is developing self directed learners who can self assess and then self adjust their performance. Self assessment and self adjustment (self management or self control) depend on feedback.

8. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Feedback

a. "Intrinsic feedback refers to the knowledge one gets immediately and automatically simply by attempting to perform a task. It is obvious when one hits the tennis ball out of the court or when one misses when swinging a baseball bat at a ball.

b. "Extrinsic feedback comes from outside the learner, provided either by an individual or a training device." (Daniel Druckman and Robert Bjork, Eds., 1994, Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, p. 51)

9. In what ways can we design learning so that feedback is built in?

10. In what ways can we increase feedback to learners?

11. For example, let’s assume that my psychology teacher says she wants me to be able to critically evaluate a newspaper article.

a. I think I can do what she asks and I explain what I think critical evaluation involves. She asks me to read a chapter about how critical evaluation differs from creative problem solving. Her feedback suggests that I don’t understand the concept of what critical evaluation is.

b. I study the chapter and answer some questions at the end of the chapter. I turn the page and find the author’s answers to the same questions. I check my answers and find that our answers are very similar. I have gotten more feedback.

c. Now that I understand that critical evaluation involves asking questions about evidence and reasoning I again talk with my psychology teacher and this time she says I understand what critical evaluation is. I have gotten more feedback.

d. I read the second chapter and learn about propaganda techniques. I answer the questions about propaganda techniques and check my answers with the author’s answers. I have gotten more feedback.

e. I come to class and the teacher puts us into small groups and gives us examples of propaganda techniques and ask us to correctly identify each example. We work individually and then we discuss. I change one of my answers after learning from a classmate that it was a bandwagon technique rather than an appeal to authority. I have gotten more feedback.

f. I later pass a quiz over critical evaluation and then a test, each a form of feedback. Rather than just getting a score, we go over each missed item to learn the correct answer so we do not make the same mistake in the future. Getting a score is some feedback but seeing the exact items I missed and learning how to correctly figure them out is better feedback.

g. The next semester in a speech class I am listening to a student speech and realize that he is using the bandwagon propaganda technique. The teacher confirms my analysis of the speech. More feedback. I have learned to apply what I learned from my psychology into the new situation of a speech course. I have learned for the long term.

12. WRITE what your view of feedback is based on what you have read and your reflections about its importance for you?

C. The Importance of feedback

1. Student learning may be increased if students get more feedback about their learning and if faculty get more feedback about their teaching.

2. As a teacher, my first questions deal with what is the current situation:

a. How much feedback do I give to students?

b. How much feedback do I get from students?

A second set of questions deal with the feedback that students get.

c. Do students use the feedback I currently give them?

d. Do I need to teach them how to use feedback?

e. In what ways can I increase the amount of feedback students receive?

A third set of questions deal with how is the feedback I get used?

f. Do I recognize the feedback that I get from my students?

g. Do I use that information in any way?

h. In what ways can I get more feedback from students?

3. What is feedback from the learner’s perspective?

a. Feedback is information that I can use or ignore.

As a learner, for those questions (problems, challenges) with one right answer, I can discover if I know the right answer.

For most situations, I can discover what I know.

I can also discover what I don’t know.

If goals or objectives are used, I can discover the gap between what I know and what I need to know.

I might get hints about how I might close the gap.

I can get another (an expert, a coach, a teacher) to assess what I need to learn.

I can learn how well I am learning (learning to learn process).

I can learn how to self assess my progress.

I can discover that I like immediate feedback, that is specific, that is helpful, that encourages me to learn, and is given by someone who cares that I learn.

I can discover that I need help from another to help me learn.

Feedback can be built into what I am to learn (answering questions in writing, answering questions in class, talking with peers) by the teacher.

I can build in feedback myself. I can ask myself questions; I can check my learning with other learners; I can check with the teacher.

b. Athletes often refer to the importance of feedback to their performance.

"Feedback is the real breakfast of champions." Vince Lombardi, football coach

c. Apprentices benefit from the feedback of the master (this approach has a long historical record).

d. This section on "The Importance of Feedback" is my attempt at giving you feedback for what you last wrote.

4. Business and industry are hard at work getting feedback from customers.

"70 to 80 percent of the refinements and the major features [for computers] are proposed by customers through feedback." (Wiggins, 1997, p. 33)

5. Four ideas about feedback in education from Wiggins (1997, pp. 33-34)

a. "You can’t learn without feedback. . . .

b. It’s not teaching that causes learning. It’s the attempts by the learner to perform that cause learning, dependent upon the quality of the feedback and opportunities to use it.

c. A single test of anything is, therefore, an incomplete assessment. We need to know whether the student can use the feedback from the results.

d. We’re wasting our time inventing increasing arcane psychometric solutions to the problem of accountability. Accountability is a function of feedback that’s useful to the learner, not to a handful of people who design the measures. . . the more self-evident the feedback to the performer, the more likely the gains."

6. Feedback can decrease anxiety since learners get hints as to how well they are learning.

D. How might faculty in higher education increase feedback to our students?

1. Increase the variety of types of feedback to students

a. Quizzes - Use more brief quizzes (written, verbal, show of hands)

b. Practice tests - At the start of the course give students a practice test.

Tests - Do learners get useful feedback? Can they get more? How can we make tests into feedback exercises?

d. Final Exams - Do learners get feedback? How might they get more feedback?

e. Lectures - Do learners get feedback on how well they are learning from a lecture? Is it prompt?

f. Class discussions - Do learners often get feedback on what they are learning?

g. Small group discussions - Do learners often get feedback on their learning?

h. Visuals - How do students get feedback on what they are learning from visuals (PowerPoint, overheads, videos, DVDs)? Can it be increased?

i. To increase feedback develop and use Example Answers. These are answers to assignments which help students understand the format and what is expected.

j. Faculty can develop and use Answer Keys. These are answers from previous students which are very good and excellent answers. Students can be asked to check their answers to the Answer Keys.

k. Increase the use of peer feedback. Writing courses often use peer feedback.

l. Use technology to give students more feedback, such as programmed instruction and computer assisted instruction.

2. Increase the frequency of feedback to students. For example, how might we get feedback to students after every 3 hours of learning?

a. During class

1) More quizzes over class activities

2) More surveys in class

3) More Think-Pair Share learning

4) More writing in class

5) More use of classroom research ideas

6) Schedule more tests (every two weeks)

7) Schedule learning experiences using the test results

8) More peer feedback

9) More individual conferences with students

b. For homework

1) Build in feedback checks for homework (Example Answers, Answer Keys).

2) Increase writing

3) Increase the use of study groups or teams

4) Self checking quizzes

5) Computer quizzes with answers

6) Teach students to self assess

7) Reward students for talking to classmates outside of class

8) Joint projects

9) More rough drafts

10) More smaller projects

11) More conferences with faculty

12) More quizzes in class over homework

E. In what ways might you increase feedback to your students?

III. In what ways can teachers get more feedback from students?

A. Analysis of formal assessments - quizzes, tests (which items are most often missed? which items distinguish between A and D students?), written assignments (what are the most common errors?), portfolios

B. Informal feedback - see classroom research sources

1. What did you like about today’s class? What was difficult? What was confusing? What do you want help on? 

2. What did you like about the homework? What was difficult? Confusing? What do you need help on?

C. Collect feedback after the first class

1. What do you anticipate from this course?

2. What are you looking forward to?

3. Is there anything that bothers you? Worries you? Confused you?

4. Do you have sufficient time to do well in this course?

5. Describe your reactions to the introduction to the course.

6. Rate the value of this first day on a scale fro 1 to 10, with 10 as the most valuable first day class you have ever experienced? Ask for a show of hands with your back turned toward the board and a student in the back telling you the number of hands raised for each number.

D. Collect feedback after each class.

1. What helped you learn?

2. What did you like most about today’s class?

3. What did you have difficulty with?

4. What was confusing?

5. What might have helped you learn better?

6. Ask students to write what they learned from class (Idea Notebook entries are used in Logic and Critical Thinking).

E. Collect feedback each week from students

1. What worked for you?

2. What did not work for you?

3. What was the most difficult thing for you this week?

4. What did you enjoy most this week?

5. Explain anything that was confusing in terms of the directions for this week.

6. Ask students to write what they are learning about how they are learning

F. Collect feedback after each test.

1. Were you clear on what to learn?

2. What had you learned well?

3. What topics did you have difficulty with?

4. What will you need to do to improve your learning for the next test?

5. How much time did you study for this test? Was it sufficient?

6. What could I have done to better help you learn?

7. Allow students for multiple choice items to explain their thinking on up to 3 items if they think their answer may not be the correct answer.

G. Collect feedback after each written assignment.

1. Does this paper represent 100% of your best effort? If no, what percent would you say?

2. What would you have needed to do to have done better work?

3. What could I as your teacher have done to help you?

4. What would you suggest to make this assignment better?

5. Ask students to describe how they accomplished the written assignment.

H. Collect feedback at mid-semester.

1. Use a comprehensive form (with answers given) that will also be used at the end of the course. Be sure to check on each objective you are teaching.

2. Also collect open ended questions, such as (1) What do you like most about this course? (2) What do you like least about this course? (4) What changes would you recommend? (5) What could you have done to learn more? (6) Other comments: 

I. Collect feedback at the end of the course

1. Use a comprehensive form with answers given.

2. Also collect open ended questions.

3. This course is like . . .? Let students describe in their own words how they see the learning experience.

4. Use an outside consultant to interview your students.

5. Select a sample of student for in-depth interviews each week (evaluators). Ask these students to get reactions from other classmates. Write up ideas and give these back to this sample to be sure you have corrected heard and summarize the suggestions. Provide class a midterm summary and do an end of course summary to provide to the next group of evaluators.

6. Select a sample of student for in-depth interviews after the last class.

7. Select a sample of student for in-depth interviews the following semester after they have taken another semester of courses.

8. Use the long form for the IDEA survey.

a. Convert T-scores into percentiles for the key items.

b. Analyze your ratings to determine where you could improve.

c. Go over your scores with a trusted peer.

d. Organize the written comments to help focus your future efforts on the course. 

J. Build into assignments a way to get feedback (depends on the course). Design your own feedback sheet for things you have written or for aspects of the textbook.

K. During lecture

1. Ask a small group of students to give feedback after each lecture.

2. Ask a rotating group of students to provide feedback weekly.

3. Ask for each student to answer:

a. Summarize the key ideas you learned today.

b. What was muddy for you?

L. During discussions

1. Ask students to evaluate their performance on specific criteria.

2. Ask students to evaluate their group members.

M. What ideas are ones you might consider using to get more feedback from students to improve your teaching and their learning?

IV. Ideas from McKeachie’s Teaching Tips (2006)

In the last section of his book entitled Lifelong Learning for Teachers, the last chapter is Vitality and Growth Throughout Your Teaching Career (McKeachie’s career was 58 years). He asked this question: "What can be done to foster continued development and enjoyment?" His concluding comment: "The great thing about teaching is that there is always more to learn. "Here are the main topics from the chapter quoted and condensed.

A. Looking for new idea - through reading, hearing, discussing, seeing, experiencing

B. Get and Use Feedback

From student performance, from peers, from faculty development specialists, from students.

1. Get the feedback early enough to make a difference for the students who give it.

2. Don’t feel you need to use a standard from.

3. Supplement end-of-course ratings.

C. Consultation

Research clearly shows you are more likely to improve if you discuss the feedback with someone.

D. Use classroom assessment techniques.

E. Use self evaluation.

For additional ideas, see the topic of Classroom Research and the sources below.

Cross, K., & Angelo, T. (1988). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

"One minute paper" "One-Sentence Summary" "What did you learn last class?"

"List the key ideas from class today?"

Angelo, T., & Cross, K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Other Useful Sources on Learning and Teaching

Bean, J. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bloom, B. et al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol 1: Cognitive domain. NY: McKay.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). How people learn: Brain, mind, experiences, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

Chickering, A., & Schlossberg, N. (1995). Getting the most out of college. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Davis, J. (1993). Better teaching, more learning: Strategies for success in postsecondary settings. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press, pp. 9-10)

Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. (Eds.), 1994, Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, p. 51)

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gamson, Z., & Chickering, A. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 5-10.

Grasha, A. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburg: Alliance Publishers.

Halpern, D., & Hakel, M. (Eds.). (2000). Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond,. New Directions For Teaching and Learning, No. 89. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. See the last chapter for an annotated reading list.

Halpern, D., & Hakel, M. (July-August, 2003). Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond: Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Changes,

Hatfield, S. (Ed.), (1995). The seven principles in action: Improving undergraduate education. Boston: Anker.

Leamnson, R. (1999). Thinking about teaching and learning: Developing habits of learning with first year college and university students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Levin, T., & Long, R. (1981). Effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips (12th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Pace, D., & Middendorf, J. (Eds.). (Summer 2004). Decoding the disciplines: Helping student learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions fo Teaching and Learning. No. 98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Walvoord, B., & Anderson, V. (1998). Effective grading. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wiggins, B. (1997). Feedback: How learning occurs. In Ellen Chaffee et al.’s Assessing impact: Evidence and action. Washington, DC: AAHE, pp. 31-39. LB2331.G3.A77)

 Return to Table of Contents

 

 

Playing I.T. Safe
An RD103/CA106 Learning Community

Eileen Cotter
Karen Penn de Martinez

Montgomery College

The following presentation describes a learning community linking ESL Reading (non-credit course) and the Computer Applications introductory credit level course.

Click here for PowerPoint presentation....

 Return to Table of Contents

 

   Creating Interactive, Online Courses

Laura Hutton
Harford Community College

Students learn most effectively when:

  • “They spend more time actively involved in learning and less time listening to lectures.”
  • “They have positive interactions with faculty and work collaboratively with fellow students; all learners – students and professors – respect and value others as learners.”
  • “They reflect on what and how they have learned.” (Middle States)

“Teaching by telling is an ineffective mode of instruction for most students.  Students must be intellectually active to develop a functional understanding (Bain).”

The purpose of this workshop is to discuss how these principles can be applied to online learning environments.

Quality Matters 

Quality Matters is an inter-institutional effort to improve the quality of online instruction in higher education in Maryland.  They have created a rubric which is used to evaluate online courses. Several of the items on this rubric apply to this discussion.

Quality Matters Peer Course Review Rubric Items I.4 & I.5

  • Instructors should create an introduction which helps him/her connect to each student.

  • Students should introduce themselves to the instructor and each other.

  • Introductions should create a sense of community.

Quality Matters Peer Course Review Rubric Items V.2, V.5 & VI.2

  • Include interaction between instructor and students.

  • Students should know that the “instructor is approachable and will regularly interact with them.”

  • Include interaction between students and content.

  • Students should “actively engage in the learning process.” 

Connecting with your students

Introductions

  • Discussion board
  • Privately reply to each student introduction
  • Link to faculty webpage

Continue to connect

  • My personal perspective
  • Personal e-mails of encouragement

 Course Content

Lecture should be no more than 20% of total class time (Bain).

Online courses can include:

  • Discussions
  • Self-checking quizzes
  • Activities from text websites
  • Lecture

The most effective learning occurs during the first 15-20 minutes of a lecture.  This time can be extended by interspersing activities to revive the students’ attention (Bain).

Tools for Adding Interaction to Online Instruction

E-Mail

  • Can be used for private communications, personal encouragement, reminders of events and due dates, and group work, other files can be attached to e-mails
  • ADVANTAGES – searchable, can be used for one-to-one and one-to-many communication, creates a record of correspondence, can be accessed at any time, correspondence can be proofread
  • DISADVANTAGES – delayed response time, student may expect an immediate response

Discussion Boards

  • Can be used for moderated discussions, thoughtful debate, peer review, and group work
  • ADVANTAGES – searchable, can be used for one-to-many communication, creates a record of correspondence, can be accessed at any time, correspondence can be proofread
  • DISADVANTAGES – delayed response time, not everyone will read every posting

Chatrooms

  • Can be used for brainstorming and virtual office hours
  • ADVANTAGES – can be archived, edited, and posted; can be used for one-to many communications; provides immediate feedback
  • DISADVANTAGES – often not accessible by all students; conversations are not private; when many are conversing, it may be difficult to keep up; speed of conversation can result in errors

Animations

  • Can be used to present content and for entertainment
  • ADVANTAGES – high engagement factor, good for visual learners
  • DISADVANTAGES – not equally accessible to all, can take additional time to download

Hyperlinks to Other Sites

  • Can be used to present outside authorities and resources
  • ADVANTAGES – many interactive options are available, promotes active learning
  • DISADVANTAGES – may not be compliant with accessibility requirements, URL’s often change

Audio and Video Files

  • Presents moving images and sound bites
  • ADVANTAGES – accommodates different learning styles, promotes active learning
  • DISADVANTAGES – may encounter difficulty with technological compatibility, not equally accessible to all, can take additional time to download

Interactive Games

  • Engages and entertains the students while they master the subject
  • ADVANTAGES – promotes active learning
  • DISADVANTAGES – can take additional time to download

Flashcards

  • Permits a student to drill him/herself until comfortable with the material
  • ADVANTAGES – promotes active learning, often available on text website
  • DISADVANTAGES – can take additional time to download

Self-checking Tests & Quizzes

  • Allows the student to exhibit mastery of the material
  • ADVANTAGES – can be repeated until answers are correct, repetitive drill increases memory, promotes active learning, rich and rapid feedback can be provided

PowerPoint Presentations

  • Can be used to create pop-ups or short slide shows.
  • ADVANTAGES – easy to create, PowerPoint viewer can be downloaded by student for free, sound and animation can be added
  • DISADVANTAGES – can take additional time to download

Useful Online Resources

www.quia.com

Quia.com is a website which allows you to create your own activities including games, quizzes, and surveys.  A wide variety of options are available including matching, fill-in-the-blank, and sequencing.  Popular games follow rules similar to “Jeopardy” and “Battleship.”  Once an activity is created, it is saved indefinitely.  Membership is required to create activities (a 30-day free trial membership is available, a year-long membership costs $49) but activities can be accessed without membership by URL.

www.wisconline.org

The Wisconsin Online Resource Center is a digital library of interactive activities called learning objects.  Membership is required to search the library and is free.  The library contains over 2000 learning objects created by Wisconsin Online Resource Center which can be accessed without membership by URL.

www.merlot.org

The Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching is a searchable database of links to a variety of online resources.  Membership is free.  The links indexed have been created by a variety of sources.  Information is included with each link regarding any copyright restrictions or fees associated with use.

 Return to Table of Contents

 

The Nursing Faculty Shortage:
A Phenomenological Approach

Cherry A. Karl
Anne Arundel Community College

The following presentation provides the quantitative description of the nursing faculty shortage and recommendations based on those findings. It then provides an alternative qualitative phenomenological approach to exploring the reasons and solutions for the shortage.

Click here for PowerPoint presentation....

Return to Table of Contents

 

Defining the Patuxent River Watershed:
An Exercise

Debby Luquette
Howard Community College

This handout contains the objectives, the instructions and questions I wanted the students to consider, but the main part of the lab was a set of GIS satellite images.


Text Box: Exercise 1
Defining the Patuxent River Watershed

 

 


Objectives:

  1. To understand the concept of a watershed.

  2. To use maps and satellite imagery to define the Patuxent River watershed.

  3. To relate personal activities, such as home, school, work, recreation, shopping, etc., to the Patuxent River watershed.

  4. To understand that since the Patuxent River flows into the Chesapeake Bay, our activities in this watershed will also affect the Bay.

  5. To get to know your classmates through cooperating in this exercise. 

Materials:

Per Group:

Maps                                          Colored pencils

Satellite images                         Rulers
 

Procedure:

This lab is a series of exercises and discussion questions interspersed in the text. You will do them with the people sitting at your lab bench, so spend some time getting to know them as you work through the exercises. Follow the instructions as they are encountered. It will be graded.

You are expected to answer the questions preceded by an asterisk*.

Introduction:

One thing we all have in common – we all live in a watershed. If you are living on an off-shore oil rig or an ocean liner, you may be an exception to this rule, but it’s a safe bet that all your normal daily activities take place in at least one watershed.

What is a watershed? It is all the land drained by a body of water. So, what does that mean? One concept that helps you understand is that of a “map.” What is a map? Let’s figure that out together.
 

* 1. Campus Map. With the people sitting at your bench, draw a map of the HCC campus in the space below – from memory. Don’t look on line or in your course catalog, student handbook or any HCC publication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* a. What features did you include? Why?


 

So, then a map is a way to organize information that you find useful in a spatial framework.

* Now I want you to take your map and add features I think are important. Where is the ground highest? Where is it lowest? How can you tell? Add them in different colored pencils.

 

I am hoping that you drew the two low points on campus as the pond and the man made “wetland” between parking lot A and the Instructional Lab Building (ILB). The pond does drain to a lower point, but students don’t generally use that area of the campus. Make sure your campus map includes the pond and wetland. If you didn’t already put them in, add them now. Knowing where the ground is high and where water collects is useful in defining a watershed.

Do you see the connection between points on campus that are lower in elevation and the presence of bodies of water? Do you think that water runs downhill from those points that are higher in elevation drain to the pond and wetland?

Look at your campus map and see that you have drawn two watersheds, two areas of land that drain to two bodies of water.

 

2. Patuxent Watershed. Now let us look at the greater watershed that we are in, the Patuxent River Watershed. Use the satellite image to mentally trace the watershed from its source to the Chesapeake Bay on the image provided. Do NOT write on these images.

 

a. Once you have found the three sources of the Patuxent River, look more closely at the features on satellite image. Can you determine within which general political division (county, city, township, etc.) the river’s sources are found? One way you can figure this out might be by looking for major roads and seeing if you can recognize a pattern with which you might already be familiar.

 

* b. Pick out the places on the image

   -    where you go to school

-         where you work

-         where you live

   -         where you shop

 

-         where the public buildings you might carry out business (county government complex)

 

-         where you recreate

* c. How do your activities in these areas impact the watershed? Be sure you include ALL your activities! (Don’t just think about driving, eating, walking. Think about the trash, waste water, etc., that you generate!) 

Answer below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  


 

* d. River water quality is very dependent on how land in the watershed is used. With the people in your group, think about how each of the following affects the water quality of the Patuxent River. Be sure to give an example of where you think this might be occurring. (Don’t worry about how much you know or don’t know right now; this is an exercise to get you thinking.)

 

Land Use
(approximate location in the county)

 Example of Where
It Occurs

 How Land Use Affects
Water Quality

 Agriculture

 

 

 

 

 

 Forested

 

 

 

 

 

 Recreation

 

 

 

 

 

 Residential –
 High Density

 

 

 

 

 Residential –
 Low Density

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1 has a list of land uses for the Patuxent River, broken down by category, and the whole Chesapeake Bay watershed. It is interesting that the Patuxent River has a lot of undeveloped land in its watershed. It is disturbing that most of the developed land in closest to the headwaters of the river in Howard, Anne Arundel and Prince George's Counties. Note the land uses on the satellite images.

 

Table 1. Comparisons of population, land area and land use and of the Patuxent River tributaries, the entire river and the Chesapeake Bay.

 

 

Little Patuxent River
Watershed
(includes Columbia)

Middle Patuxent River Watershed

Entire
Patuxent River
Watershed

Entire Chesapeake Bay Watershed

 
Population (2000)

 
181,887

 
36,560 

 
590,769

 
15,594,241

 
Land Area
(square miles)

 

103 

 

58

 

957

 

66,388

 
Developed


27
(26.2%)

 
3
(5.2%)

 
102
(10.7%)

 
2,409
(3.6%)

 

Agriculture

 

 

31

(30.1%)

 

32

(55.2%)

 

328

(34.3%)

 

18,895

(28.5%)

 

Forested

 

 

37

(35.9%)

 

22

(37.9%)

 

405

(42.3%)

 

39,901

(60.1%)

 

Open Water

 

 

1

(1.0%)

 

0

 

 

61

(6.4%)

 

2,863

(4.3%)

 

Wetland

 

 

6

(5.8%)

 

1

(1.7%)

 

52

(5.4%)

 

1,707

(2.6%)

 

Barren

 

 

2

(1.9%)

 

0

 

 

9

(0.94%)

 

599

(0.90%)

Information Ownership, Use and Distribution of Chesapeakebay.net material:

Information presented on this web site is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. All documents and information may be freely distributed and used for non-commercial, scientific and educational purposes. Commercial use of the documents available from this server may be protected under the U.S. and foreign copyright Laws. Individual documents on this web site may have different copyright conditions that will be noted in those documents. Any communication or material transmitted to this web site by electronic mail or otherwise, including any data, questions, comments, suggestions or the like will be treated as public information.http://www.chesapeakebay.net/termsofuse.htm

e. Using Table 1.

 

 

Text Box:  

 

Text Box:  

 

Text Box:  

 

Text Box:       Little Patuxent River
 
      Middle Patuxent River
 
       Entire Patuxent River

 

Text Box:   % Land             % Land                  % Land
Developed        Agricultural             Forested

 

 

 

 

* Since you have thought about how your activities affect the Patuxent River Watershed, take a look at Table 1 and the graph in figure 1.

 

  1. What % of the entire Patuxent River population resides in the Little Patuxent watershed? (Get out your calculator and figure it out.)

 

 

  1. What % of the Little Patuxent watershed is developed? How does this compare to that of the Middle Patuxent River and the entire Patuxent River?

 

 

 

 

3.  Do you think there is some correlation between the % of developed land in the Little Patuxent River watershed, the % of population, and the health of the river?

 

 

 

 

 

Return to Table of Contents

 

Problem Based Learning:
Its Use in the Nursing Skills Lab

 Kathleen M. Martin, MS, RN, CS
Lisa A. Gotschall, MS, RN, CS

Frederick Community College

This presentation will describe the concept of Problem Based Learning and how it is utilized to teach basic and intermediate nursing skills. We will also describe the successful integration of technology into our nursing skills lab since the addition of our “Virtual Nurses Station.”

Click here for PowerPoint presentation....


Return to Table of Contents

 

What Works in Classes for Us
Dr. Pete Paulson
College of Southern Maryland

The participants shared their successful classroom strategies. Everyone received a condensed transcript of the discussion, a copy of which is reprinted below.

What Works for Us: Ideas Presented by the Audience

Some of the suggestions are repeated and some appear under more than one heading. I have attempted to avoid repeating an idea under one heading.

Ways to gain class participation

• Assign individual students to answer specific questions on a worksheet or paragraphs in a reading. They are responsible for explaining their part to the class.
• Learn names
• Group work, Jeopardy
• Small group process: after 15 minute portions of lecture, have groups summarize or answer questions to extend knowledge
• Participatory seating arrangement
• Students put questions on 3 by 5 cards and a student reads them to the class
• Pull cards with student names from a file box to use as a calling order
• Large and small class presentations
• The hand-off method, in which one student passes an object (perhaps a board marker) off to another student chosen at random for work at the board
• Students writing on the smart board during class
• Journaling—coming up with ideas to journal about through the semester
• Skits
• Tell students we are going to call on individuals
• Ice breakers
• Guest speakers
• Think-pair-share
• Write first
• Online quizzes prior to the class to ensure reading of chapter
• Application to personal life experiences
• Handouts to stimulate group discussion
• Ask students what they use for research
• Small group discussions with faculty about internet and library materials
• Create a culture in which students feel comfortable to participate
• Brainstorming and prewriting
• Humor
• Music
• Give a quiz
• Give some wait time
• Teach active listening
• Students report on sections of chapters to rest of class
• Group in unusual ways: by zip code, birth date, etc.
• Use play money “prizes” to be cashed in at end of class
• Use pre-quizzes to see how much they already know

Materials that work well

• Short paragraphs with subjects students can relate to
• interactive computer activities
• Handouts in colors
• Current event articles
• Handouts with some missing words
• Games/competitions
• Folder for each student
• Tote bag for folders for each class
• Manipulatives
• Beautiful pictures that illustrate concepts
• Compelling, funny, thoughtful quotes
• Original posters
• Videos, DVD’s
• Students’ work passed as examples
• PowerPoint , with exercises included
• Websites linked with the textbook
• Demonstrations in which students “act out” some concept
• Unusual examples
• Funny-sounding terms and funny ideas
• Appeals to students interests, such as rap music
• Handouts focused on specific sections of the material
• Current reading materials
• Problem-solving activities to tap into learners’ curiosity
• Games
• Guest speakers
• Journals
• Observations

Technology and other visual aids

• Jeopardy on PowerPoint for review
• Smart board
• LCD projector
• Virginia Tech—study skills
• Purdue OWL—research papers
• Music, videos, interactive computer programs
• Students “draw” concepts with crayon
• Cut out advertisements when studying propaganda or fallacies in logical thinking
• Materials from professional organizations
• NIAC for computer security, information assurance
• Internet
• Computerized illustrations
• Film and video clips
• Virtual field trips
• Web pages for the class
• Hands-on research
• Show and tell

Reserve and other ancillary readings and media

• Trade magazines
• Professional journals
• Tapes and short video clips
• “at home” television shows (Nature or Nova)
• on-line question and answer for extra credit
• H.G. Wells’ Land of the Blind about culture and “fitting in”
• Current articles
• Web sites on the field
• Interactive programs
• Newspapers
• Supplementary books
• Professional associations, such as NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children)
• Chapter outlines
• Chapter study guides
• When available, textbook website quizzes and tests for practice

Methods of assessment

• Power write for two minutes and explain what you know about
• Papers, projects, portfolios
• Combination take-home/in class test. The take-home form forces the students to study; the in-class test asks the same questions but students do not use notes
• Student research presentations
• Class participation
• Homework
• We use rubrics and matrices, for more consistency
• Monthly index cards
• Field reports
• Lab reports on group activity and personal synthesis
• Cooperatively taken essay take-home quizzes
• Authentic assessments, including journals and logs
• Formative assessments—usually a few, short responses or writing activities
• One-minute summary
• Case studies
• Each student teaches a concept learned to another student before leaving class
• Peer- and self-evaluation forms
• Scoring structures BCR’s and ECR’s
• Comprehensive project done in steps throughout the semester, with one step due each week

Cooperative learning

• Groups make up specific types of test questions
• Presentations
• Peer editing
• Work teams
• Skits
• Vocabulary groups—students get a term to define, pronounce, give the opposite, and use in a sentence
• Competitive group exercises
• Short story composition
• Poetry interpretation
• A major topic is broken into smaller parts and assigned for students to do separate pieces of research, which are combined and presented to the class
• Group lab work
• Concept mapping by a group
• Pair students of different ability levels
• Activities to facilitate sharing and team building
• Students assisting one another with technology
• Small groups teach a concept or topic to the class (perhaps given roles such as “secretary,” etc.)
• Learners expect others to learn, as well as themselves
• Think, pair, share
• Group brainstorm
• Education students critique a classroom shown in a drawing

Other approaches

• Have groups of students make up test questions to stump other groups
• Play Hangman to review vocabulary
• Give each student two vocabulary words, group students in 4’s or 5’s and have them write a story using their vocabulary words and then reading their stories to the class
• Concept mapping
• Guest speakers
• On the first day ask each student to give a metaphor for writing (how it feels to them). You can use for reading or math. This introduces an “affective” part to the introduction.
• Experiential learning
• Field activities
• Computer-based games, Jeopardy, Wheel of Fortune
• Virtual field trips
• Virtual classrooms to other institutions
• A Jeopardy template on line, for review
• Plays
• Let students make suggestions about what they want to see in the classroom
• Peer mentor; a student (who has previously passed the course) working in the classroom to help individual students and lead small groups
• Use the fact that textbook authors and publishers place more reliance on illustrations, graphics, etc. than they did before the MTV generation.

 

Return to Table of Contents

 

Teaching as Art:
Some Crucial Implications

Nicholas Plants 
Prince George's Community College

One of the primary aims of aesthetics, or the philosophy of art, is to answer the question, “What is art?” Though defining art, like defining beauty, is notoriously difficult, it is aided by the aesthetic via negativa, that is, by approaching a definition of what art is via an articulation of what it is not.

According to the philosopher of art, R.G. Collingwood (1889-1943), for example, art is not craft. This negative definition is more helpful to teachers than it first appears because it enables us to further articulate what we do not mean when, as the title of our conference suggests, we conceive of teaching as art. Why this conception? The sub-title provides a clue: good teaching involves creating a learning environment and such creation, no less than art, requires creativity.

Like art, however, craft requires creativity and Collingwood for one believes that distinguishing art from craft helps us to better understand art. I believe we can similarly better understand what it means to conceive of teaching as art if, following Collingwood, we maintain that the art of teaching, though surely related, is not equivalent, to craft. Such is my aim in what follows, as is noting some crucial implications doing so holds for teaching and learning in the community college setting.  

Far from disparaging craft Collingwood seeks to authenticate it and art alike, precisely by distinguishing the two. His real concern is not craft alone, but rather what he calls the ‘technical theory of art’--the view that works of art function instrumentally, as means to various other ends. According to this theory an artist uses her skill to evoke psychological reactions in her audience. “Where an emotion is aroused, as an enjoyable experience, the craft of arousing it is amusement..... Where intellectual faculties are stimulated for the mere sake of their exercise, the work designed to stimulate them is a puzzle; where for the sake of knowing this or that thing, it is instruction.”[1] No less than artists whose works, conceived of according to the technical theory, are means to ends apart from themselves, teachers amuse, puzzle, and otherwise instruct our students, and do so as means to the end of learning. Our doing so further explains why teaching is conceived of as an art and the resulting tendency to approach teaching in the same technical manner as many do art.

It is because he does not believe that art is what the technical theory claims it is that Collingwood distinguishes art from craft, however. He sees craft as fitting the technical theory but believes that art does not, and so distinguishes art from craft, leaving the technical theory to apply more properly to craft. Art does not fit the technical theory for several reasons, the most salient of which are: (1) that craft unlike art necessarily requires some distinction between means and ends and (2) that craft equally involves some distinction between planning and execution.

First, the means by which a horseshoe is forged are clearly distinct from the finished shoe. As such, the process whereby it is made is secondary to the end product such that the two are clearly distinguishable from each other. Such is not always the case with art, since the medium in which a feeling is expressed may be inseparable from its expression. “Of a poem, for example, one might say that it is really as much about words as it is about what these particular words are being used to say; or, of a statue, that its real subject is as much the stone as the figure that has been carved out from it.”[2] Process and product are not always as clearly distinguishable in art as in craft, therefore, since the means of expression may itself be the artist’s end.    

Second, although art may involve some degree of planning, its execution is not as dependent on it as craft, in which the two can thus be more clearly distinguished. If a carpenter intends to make a table but does not plan its dimensions before cutting the wood, what he executes is not craft. Where the craftsperson specifies a plan before executing it, and as such has a preconceived end for the sake of which he uses the best means to realize it, the artist often lacks such precise foreknowledge, sometimes intentionally so. If a sculptor were “simply playing about with clay, and found the clay under his fingers turning into a little dancing man: is this not a work of art because it was done without being planned in advance?”[3] We must answer in the negative because art does not require planning to the degree craft does, and so may culminate in works whose execution was not planned.

Though there are additional reasons why Collingwood does not believe that art fits the technical theory whereas craft does, what warrants further discussion are the crucial implications that follow from his two initial reasons. Before beginning such a discussion, however, it is important to make Collingwood’s position clear. He is not claiming that art never involves distinctions between means and ends or planning and execution, but rather than art need not involve these distinctions whereas craft always does, at least to some degree. As such craft fits the technical theory better than art since this theory claims that artworks function instrumentally, as means to ends--the distinction which has been shown to be indispensable to craft rather than to art. The first of Collingwood’s reasons why art is not craft make it clear that art, since it need not involve the distinction between means and ends, does not fit the technical theory, whose primary claim is that art is a means to ends other than itself. Although works of art indeed amuse, puzzle, instruct, or otherwise edify, their doing so is not what makes them art, since unlike craft and the technical theory that best defines it, art is not solely instrumental.[4]

Since art is not solely instrumental, it is a mistake to conceive of education, no less than art, according to the technical theory. When we conceive of teaching as art, it is tempting to not simply adopt the technical theory of art, but to accordingly adopt what we might call the ‘technical theory of education.’ No less than art, education is commonly seen as a means to ends other than itself. Just as art functions instrumentally so too may education. Art is a means to the end of popularity, for example, whereas education is a means to the end of financial gain. Neither art nor education are ends in themselves, when thus conceived technically, for they are means to ends other than themselves. Doing so is common enough, but is all the more likely when teaching is conceived of as art, since this conception, when understood according to the technical theory, encourages education and art to each be viewed as instrumentally as the other. 

Doing so with regard to education is as much a mistake as with art, however, and is such for the same reasons given for art: education need not involve the distinction between means and ends any more than that between planning and execution.

First, education is an end in itself, not solely a means to ends  other than itself, and so need not involve the distinction between means and ends. Although it may be a means to ends other than itself, when learning is engaged in by students and teachers alike as an end in itself, the means/end distinction the technical theory of education involves is no longer required. When teachers create a learning environment in which learning is regarded as an end in itself learning occurs for its own sake, regardless of whatever else it might be used for, whether by students or by teachers. And so creating a learning environment is as much a matter of promoting learning as an end in itself as it is of doing so creatively, although both are necessary. Doing either, much less both, is as daunting as the attempt to express emotions in a way that is inseparable from their expression. For any such attempt to combine process and product in this manner requires the passion of the teacher for whom education is an end in itself and the creativity of the artist for whom profound emotions, such as love, must themselves be expressed in ways inseparable from their expression, lest they be diminished, or perhaps even forgotten.     

Second, precisely because education is an end in itself, neatly distinguishing its execution from its planning is not necessary in order for it to occur. Learning can just as easily be precluded as aided by a precisely articulated lesson plan and very often occurs when we least expect it, that is, exactly when it is least planned. The more we attempt to ‘fit’ learning into the neatly articulated plan we have for a semester, the less learning is often executed. Our exact planning often enables us to ‘cover’ the material by the end of the semester but we often do so at the cost of the learning environment we had hoped to create so that covering would yield to learning, which usually has a calendar and syllabus all its own.  Since such yielding requires students and teachers to be flexible, it enables the genesis of a creative learning environment in which foreknowledge must take a backseat to spontaneity and the play of imagination, both of which are required of the artist who often lacks the plan whereby she might more precisely execute a work. The serendipity that animates such environments does not permit learning to be as planned as it is when it is clearly distinguished from its execution.    

Conceiving of teaching as art thus need not entail adopting the technical theory of education, nor that of art. The implications of not doing so while at the same time conceiving of teaching as art by creating a learning environment are as numerous as they are crucial, the most significant of which is that education and art can be practiced as ends in themselves in whom process and product need not be clearly distinguished. The process whereby teachers teach students is our product, provided we create an environment in which learning is sought for its own sake, an environment the creation of which is rightly conceived as art. Although the art of teaching is no less daunting once we thus conceive of it properly, examples help further inspire it. I can think of no better example than jazz. As teachers we are leaders of a jazz group all of whose members have instruments, or books, with which to play and who usually need only a few bars of music to get into a groove which, because it is not exactly planned will develop as it goes, but the improvisational spirit of which will enable it to collectively respond to the rigors of learning in a way that we, no less than they, may regard as a work of art.

By way of concluding I would like to mention that the technical theory of education is understandably prevalent in the community college setting, particularly within vocational circles. “There used to be a reasonably widespread grasp of the difference between education and vocational training, the difference being that vocational training, unlike education, is technical. The trainee is taught skills and techniques useful for realizing preconceived ends of various kinds. The trainee is taught crafts; and of course this is valuable. No one doubts that.”[5] No one should doubt or otherwise diminish the value of vocational training and the technical skills it imparts to its trainees, from which we all benefit in critical ways. Because it is often offered alongside academic education in many community colleges, though, the relationship between vocational and academic education is only as collaborative as the differences between them are recognized and respected. Doing so has been a key aim of this presentation because the differences between the two often go unrecognized and are then disrespected, ironically enough, within the very setting wherein vocational and academic learning often occur in adjacent classrooms.  

One beauty of community colleges is that such proximity itself fosters the exchanges in which the distinction between academic and vocational education, no less than that between art and craft, is recognized and thereby respected. Unlike the traditional college setting in which the vocational dimension of education is minimal or absent, community colleges are crucibles for the collaboration whereby academic and vocational learning are rightly integrated. Thus the art of teaching need not be limited to the classroom but is rather authentically practiced when, in addition to creating a learning environment in our individual classrooms, we each make the time to recognize the key differences between academic and vocational education, and so appreciate the crucial implications of their sharing in a relationship that is as beneficial to our students as it is collegial. Doing so creates community college campuses that are true learning environments.                   

[1] R.G. Collingwood, The Principles of Art (London: Oxford University Press, 1938) 32.

[2] Aaron Ridley, R.G. Collingwood (London: Phoenix, 1998) 28.

[3] Collingwood, Principles, 22.

[4] Collingwood recognizes that overlap between art and craft exists: “The distinction between planning and executing certainly exists in some works of art, namely those which are also works of craft; for there is, of course, an overlap between these two things, as may be seen by the example of a building or a jar, which is made to order for the satisfaction of a specific demand, to serve useful purposes, but may none the less be a work of art.” Principles, 21.

[5] Ridley, R.G. Collingwood, 50. Ridley notes that education is often called ‘academic’ education so as to distinguish it from vocational training.

Return to Table of Contents



 

 

 Barriers to Distance Education 
as Perceived by Computing Faculty at 

Two Washington, D.C. Area Community Colleges

 Homer Sharafi
Prince George’s Community College

Outline:

What is this study about?
         o
       Rational for the study
        
o       Questions the study sought to answer

How about other studies?
         
o       Differences between this study & other studies

How was this study conducted?

Results of this study

Conclusions

 
What is this study about?

This study examines barriers to distance education (DE) as perceived by the computing faculty at 

o       NVCC (94 FT/PT faculty members)

§        5 campuses 

o       PGCC  (42 FT/PT faculty members)

§        1 main campus and

§        3 extension centers

DE at NVCC and PGCC conducted using 

o       synchronous media

§        videoconferencing 

o       asynchronous media

§        Blackboard

Rational for the study 

o       According to the US Dept. of Education, between 1997 & 1998 

§        70% of all colleges offered DE courses in the humanities and the social sciences

 §        26% of all colleges offering DE courses offered DE computing courses

                                                33% of all the 2-year colleges offered DE computing courses

                                                25% of all the public 4-year colleges offered DE courses in computing

                                                14% of all the private 4-year colleges offered similar DE courses

Questions the study sought to answer

  • Do computing instructors perceive the same general barriers to DE as those reported
     in the  literature? 

  • Are there discipline-specific barriers that should be taken into account by instructors in order to facilitate the delivery of DE in computing courses?

  • Does the pedagogical content of computing curriculum pose barriers to DE that are different than the general barriers reported in the literature?

  • Does the format of DE delivery technology pose a barrier to teaching computing courses from a distance?

 

How about other studies?
 

Researchers have tried to understand barriers to DE in a variety of settings: 

o       Corporate 

o       Educational 

§        Elementary 

§        Secondary 

§        Post-secondary

Types of barriers identified by these studies include

o       administrative barriers

§        prevent DE from being conducted effectively.  Examples include:

·        course registration

·        tuition payment

·        library services

·        faculty teaching assignments and promotion 

o       instructor-related barriers

§        affect the instructor engaged in DE

·        inadequate monetary compensation

·        the need to commit a greater amount of time to teaching DE courses

·        the need to keep pace with the changes in technologies used when teaching DE courses

o       student-related barriers

§   affect the student taking a course from a distance directly

  • feeling of isolation due to a lack of social interaction with other students

  • lack of student support services to provide

o       tutors

o       advisors

o       technical assistance

Differences between this study & other studies 

o       Researchers have been studying general barriers to DE

o       Surveying done by mass-mailing questionnaires to faculty in various programs

o       Results compiled without taking into consideration discipline-specific barriers

o       This study looked into general barriers as well as discipline-specific barriers 

o       This study targeted computing educators only

How was this study conducted?

 o       A pilot study was conducted

§    At least a dozen computing faculty members in area colleges/universities provided feedback on suitability of survey questions

§    Questions were accordingly fine-tuned 

o       Questionnaires & consent forms were sent to computing faculty at NVCC & PGCC 

o       26% returned filled-out questionnaires 

o       Each questionnaire:

§      A section on demographics

§      A quantitative section

.        20 questions

.        used a five-point Likert scale

§      A qualitative section

.        10 questions

.        Interview-style, open-ended questions

§      Data analysis

.        Quantitative section

Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data

.        Qualitative section

Cross-referencing of data was used to analyze the responses

Results of this study

Question #1 

o       Top 5 general barriers identified by other researchers were used to get responses 

§    Lack of time 

§    Inadequate monetary compensation 

§    Cultural change 

§    Student assessment 

§    Lack of infrastructure

o       Lack of time 

§    Over 70% agree with participants of other studies that teaching a DE course takes considerably more time than teaching the same course in a classroom 

o        Inadequate monetary compensation 

§    Over 62% disagree with participants of other studies that inadequate monetary compensation  is a major barrier to DE 

o       Cultural change 

§    The administrations at NVCC & PGCC receive high marks from over 77% of the participants for the way they handle DE programs. 

§    Respondents, however, believe that any cultural change w.r.t. DE needs to be addressed by student body: 

·   Student body not well-equipped to take DE courses 

·   A lot of students think that taking an online course is easier than taking the same course as a face-to-face course. 

o        Student assessment 

§    A majority of study participants agree with those participating in other studies

·   60% agree that it’s a major barrier 

o       Lack of infrastructure 

§   Over 74% of study participants think there are plenty of training for those interested in DE teaching 

§   Over 57% of study participants think the DE programs keep pace with advances in technologies needed to run DE programs 

§    Not a major barrier as far as computing faculty are concerned at NVCC & PGCC 

Question #2.1

o    The pedagogical content of computing curriculum does pose additional barriers to teaching DE computing courses

o    Over 74% think that it is not an easy task to teach logic and problem-solving concepts

o   Close to 63% think that it is not easy to teach a DE computing course, since it usually requires use of a variety of software systems

o   Nearly 55% think that one-on-one interaction with a student to go over lab projects is not an easy task

o   Over 57% think that it’s a challenging task to teach programming languages, especially low-level programming languages.

Question #2.2

o   The format of DE delivery technology does not seem to pose a barrier to teaching DE computing courses

§    Over 54% are neutral on whether they prefer synchronous or asynchronous media

§    Over 34% prefer asynchronous media

§    Over 11% prefer synchronous media

Conclusions

  • While some of the top general barriers to DE have been experienced by computing faculty at these 2 colleges, other top general barriers to DE reported by participants in other studies  are not regarded as major barriers to DE by these computing faculty.

  • There are barriers to DE that are specific to computing courses.

  • This may be a big reason why DE computing programs have not thrived as well as programs in the humanities and the social sciences.

    Return to Table of Contents

 

What is Teaching?

 William D. Stark
Anne Arundel Community College
wdstark@aacc.edu

Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education, Daniel D. Pratt and Associates, Krieger Publishing Company, 1998.   ISBN 0-89464-937-X 

Some teachers seem to be naturally effective from the beginning as exhibited by their class averages and student evaluations, but many of us must work to become effective.  There are many factors that contribute to success as a teacher, i.e. having successful students: good rapport with the students, clear goals and objectives, organized materials and resources, effective presentations and teaching methods, timely assessment and feedback.  Lists have been described many times in different terms, but the ideas are generally well known.  Another factor, underlying the choices that influence the above factors, is the perspective that the teacher and the students have on the teaching/learning process.  When there is a disparity between the teacher’s and the students’ beliefs and expectations about what should happen in and outside the classroom, everyone is likely to be somewhat frustrated.  When the teaching is evaluated these differences can also lead to misunderstandings and dissatisfaction.  The purpose of this book is to “...provoke critical reflection on issues of evaluation and quality, while respecting diversity within adult and higher education.” (p. xiv).  The author provides some conceptual tools for this reflection.

Related texts:

Apps, G. W. (1991).  Mastering the Teaching of Adults.  Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Co.

Brookfield, S. D. (1990).  The Skillful Teacher.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995).  Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Fenstermacher, G. D., & Soltis, J. F. (1986).  Approaches to Teaching.  New York: Teachers College Press.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1986).  Models of Teaching, (3rd ed.).  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 

Return to Table of Contents

 

updated: September 14, 2006